K.Kumar, v. The Chief Educational Officer,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 05.02.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA Writ Petition No.30429 of 2008 and M.P. No.1 of 2008 K.Kumar .. Petitioner Vs 1.Chief Educational Officer, Salem, Salem District.

2.A.Barnabass .. Respondents (R2 impleaded as per order dated 22.10.2009 made in M.P. No.1 of 2009 in W.P. No.30429 of 2008) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the appeal dated 29.09.2008 preferred by the petitioner after giving opportunity to all the concerned persons. For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Ganesan For Respondents:

Mr.K.Karthikeyan, Government Advocate for R1 Mr.S.Sivakumar for R2

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner was granted the appointment of Physical Education Teacher and therefore, the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed. No costs. vga Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Salem, Salem District.

+1cc to M/s.Law Square, Advocate, S.R.No.9683 +1cc to the Government Pleader, vide S.R.No.10756 Writ Petition No.30429 of 2008 kak(27/02/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/