Madras High CourtWP/17151/2010dismissed

P.Sundaresan, v. The District Collector,

2019-07-29Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. 17151 of 2010 and M.P. 1 of 2010 P.Sundaresan, Contractor ... Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector,

2. The District Collector, Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram Dt.

3. The District Collector, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur Dt.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram Dt.

6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur Dt.

7. The Assistant Director of Mines,

8. The Assistant Director of Mines, Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram Dt.

9. The Assistant Director of Mines, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur Dt.

10. The District Collector, Chennai, Chennai District.

11. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chennai, Chennai District.

12. The Assistant Director of Mines, Chennai, Chennai District.

... Respondents

PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from insisting the petitioner and the petitioner's customers either to obtain transport permits or to get mentioning of the final place of destination in the bills issued by the Public Works Department to transport the processed / filtered sand from the stockyard of the petitioner located at S.No.163/1B, Puliyankannu Village, Walaja Taluk, Vellore District, to the place of the petitioner's purchaser's destination.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govindaraj For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh, Addl. Govt. Pleader

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to forbear the respondents from insisting the petitioner and the petitioner's customers either to obtain transport permits or to get mentioning of the final place of destination in the bills issued by the Public Works Department to transport the processed/filtered sand from the stockyard of the petitioners' land.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that since the sand quarry was already taken over by the Government, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition. Hence, he prayed to dismiss the Writ Petition.

3. As nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition and also recording the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

rpp Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To