U.Maraikayar Sait v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 27.06.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.32862 of 2004 and WP.MP.No.39771 of 2004 U.Maraikayar Sait

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The Inspector of Police, Vaniyampadi Town Police Station, Vaniyampadi.

2.G.M.Aslam and Co, represented by its Partner, G.Mohammed Ismail.

3. A.Abdul Sukoor

4. M.Mukthakar Ahmed

5. M.Riaz Ahmed

...Respondents

Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 1st respondent from interfering with the business transactions of the petitioner without following the due process of Law.

For Petitioner : Mr.Gokulakrishnan, for Mr.T.Gowthaman For Respondents : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Spl.G.P., for R1 Mr.C.K.M. Appaji, for R2 No Appearance, for RR3 to 5

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In the light of the above submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To The Inspector of Police, Vaniyampadi Town Police Station, Vaniyampadi.

+1 cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.54473 W.P.No.32862 of 2004 VG-I(CO) SSM(07/08/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/