Pavan Kumar v. State By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of February Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.2623 of 2021 PAVUNKUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P.E.W.THIRUVANNAMALAI POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAAMALAI DISTRICT.

CR NO.954/2020.

For Petitioner : M/S.R.BALAKRISHNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused. Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(aa) r/w 4(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, in Crime No.954 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that when the respondent police were in patrol duty they found the petitioner was in possession of 55 liters of ID arrack in black colour lorry tube. On enquiry they came to know that the petitioner was also selling Arrack. Hence, the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not indulged in any offence and hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner was in possession of 55 liters of ID arrack. He further submitted that the petitioner has one previous case.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions :

(a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Thiruvannamalai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity. (c) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

(d) The petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(e) The petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(f) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. (g) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 23/02/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, TIRUVANNAMALAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUVANNAMALAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P.E.W. THIRUVANNAMALAI POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAAMALAI DISTRICT.

+1 CC to M/S.R.BALAKRISHNAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.2192 CRL OP.2623/2021 Date :23/02/2021 TA-10/03/2021