← Library
Madras High CourtWP/30452/2014disposed of

S.Sugendrakumar, v. The General Manager,

2015-02-24Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Sasidharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.02.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Writ Petition No.30452 of 2014 & M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 S.Sugendrakumar .. Petitioner Vs.

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore District - 43.

.. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to the impugned No. 2892/CBE/DR27/E3Aa/52.Aa/ Pa.Thu1/Tha.Aa.Po.Ka (Ko) 14 dated 23.05.2014 along with relieving order dated 01.10.2014 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to continue in a specified Branch i.e. Karumathampaty Branch or any one branch in Coimbatore City without frequent interruption in the form of frequent transfers within time limit. For Petitioner : M/s.C.Veeraraghavan For Respondent : Mr.P.Kannankumar

O R D E R

The petitioner is a Driver appointed by the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited. The petitioner was transferred from Coimbatore to Gudalur by order dated 23.05.2014. He was relieved by order dated 01.10.2014. The petitioner challenges the transfer order on the ground that he was subjected to routine transfers from one place to another. The petitioner has also taken up a contention that his family is placed at Coimbatore and in case he is made to work at Gudalur, it would cause financial difficulties.

2. The present transfer appears to be the sixth one, whereby https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and whereunder he was transferred to Gudalur. In any case, the petitioner has already joined at Gudalur.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation, on instructions, submitted that three transfer orders were made pursuant to the request made by the petitioner.

4. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner has submitted a representation to the respondent to review the order of transfer.

5. The petitioner is given liberty to submit a comprehensive representation to the respondent. The respondent is directed to consider the said representation on merits, taking into account the earlier orders of transfer and the fact that his family is presently located at Coimbatore. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of representation.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ajr To The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore District - 43.

1 cc to Mr.C.Veeraraghavan ,Advocate, SR.No.10094 1 cc to Mr.P.Kannankumar ,Advocate, SR.No.10179 W.P.No. 30452 of 2014 scd(co) pmk.13.3.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/