Smt.M.Chitra, v. The Regional Transport

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.11.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P. No. 1858 of 2010 M.Chitra

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The Regional Transport Authority, Krishnagiri.

2.The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, City Civil Court Building, Chennai - 600 104.

3.The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Krishnagiri.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent relating to Appeal No.148 of 2009 dated 29.09.2009 confirming the order of the first respondent made in R.No.B3/35487/2008 dated 01.06.2009 and further direct the first respondent to grant the autorickshaw in respect of APE PIAGGIO DIESEL MAKE VEHICLE as sought for by the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindaraman For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh - for R1 & R3 Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

No costs.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition if any, is closed.

vsi2 Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Co) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Regional Transport Authority, Krishnagiri.

2.The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, City Civil Court Building, Chennai - 600 104.

3.The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Krishnagiri.

+1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.NO. 78791 W.P. No. 1858 of 2010 ASK(12/12/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/