P.Ramalingam v. A.Rejinamary

C.M.P. No.2727 of 2024 in C.M.A.Sr No.12417 of 2024 C.M.P. No.2727 of 2024 in C.M.A.Sr. No.12417 of 2024 R.HEMALATHA, J.

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 235 days in filing this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. Since the first respondent remained absent before the Tribunal and was set exparte, issuance of notice to the first respondent is dispensed with.

3.Mr.C.R.Krishnamoorthy, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat for the second respondent and Mr.C.Sathish, learned Government Advocate undertakes to file vakalat for the third respondent and did not raise any serious objection in allowing this petition.

4. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 235 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. 5.Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.C.R.Krishnamoorthy, learned counsel for the second respondent and Mr.C.Sathish, learned Government Advocate for the third respondent in the cause list.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.P. No.2727 of 2024 in C.M.A.Sr No.12417 of 2024 R.HEMALATHA, J.

mtl

6. Registry is also directed to number the main Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course.

7. It is made clear that for the period of delay of 235 days, the appellants will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. 30.10.2024 mtl C.M.P. No.2727 of 2024 in C.M.A.Sr. No.12417 of 2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis