K.Aseervatham v. The Management

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.12.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU W.P.Nos.10870 & 10871 of 2005 W.P.No.10870 of 2005 K.Aseervatham .... Petitioner vs .... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for records on the file of the respondent relating to the impugned order dated 13.05.2003 in I.D.No.587 of 2001 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service and back wages and all other benefits. For Petitioner : No appearance For respondents : Mr.R.Babu for R1 R2-Court 1/4

W.P.No.10871 of 2005 R.Ganesan .... Petitioner vs .... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the award passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem dated 06.02.2003 in I.D.No.46 of 2002 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service and back wages and all other attendant benefits.

For Petitioner : No appearance For respondents : Mr.R.Babu for R1 R2-Court COMMON ORDER When the matter came up for hearing on 08.12.2022, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed 2/4

to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 09.12.2022. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the writ petitions for non-prosecution. Hence, the Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

13.12.2022 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order vsi To 3/4

J.NISHA BANU,J.

vsi W.P.Nos.10870 & 10871 of 2005 13.12.2022 4/4