Arputham v. The Chairman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.03.2025 Coram THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Arputham ... Petitioner -Versus1.The Chairman, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 600 001.
2.The FA & CAO, Finance Department, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 600 001.
3.The Chief Engineer, Civil Engineering Department, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 600 001.
4.The Secretary, General Administration Department, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 600 001.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents consider and sanction the order of extension of the family pension to the petitioner in pursuant to her representation dated 23.03.2024 and fix the time frame to dispose of the
representation.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthamizh Selvakumar For Respondent : Mr.Haja Mohideen Gisthi, Standing Counsel
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has made the following endorsement in the court bundle:
"Petitioner seeks permit to withdrawn the case."
2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
27.03.2025 nl Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non speaking order
To 1.The Chairman, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 600 001.
2.The FA & CAO, Finance Department, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 600 001.
3.The Chief Engineer, Civil Engineering Department, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 600 001.
4.The Secretary, General Administration Department, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 600 001.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
nl
27.03.2025