← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P/2538/2015closed

K.Kumar v. K.Phanindra Reddy Ias

2020-03-06Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.03.2020 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Contempt Petition No.2538 of 2015 K.Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. Mr.K.Phanindra Reddy, I.A.S., Secretary to Municipal Administration, and Water Supply Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2. Mr.K.Maharabushanam, I.A.S., Director of Town Panchayats, Kuralagam, Chennai 600 108.

3. Mr.Vai Sivakaminathan, Executive Officer, Ilupur Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Pudukottai District.

... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, praying to punish the respondents for their wilfull disobedience to the order of the High Court in W.P.No.35065 of 2013 dated 05.02.2014.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raja For Respondents : Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.G.Rajesh, Government Advocate for Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Government Pleader for R3

O R D E R

The present Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.35065 of 2013 dated 05.02.2014. Pending the contempt petition, the Town Panchayat has filed Review Application in Review Application No.174 of 2019 before this Court which was dismissed as withdrawn today. Subsequently Government has considered the claim of the petitioner and an order was passed rejecting the claim of the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent.

3. Today, when the Contempt Petition is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 and the learned counsel appearing for third respondent submitted that the said order of this Court had been complied with by the respondents. It is further submitted that the respondents have passed an order rejecting the claim of the petitioner.

4. Since the order of this Court had been complied with by the respondents, nothing further survives for consideration in this Contempt Petition, which is accordingly closed. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the said order of rejection in the manner known to law before the appropriate forum.

SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) dpq //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2020. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

SMI/16.06.2020 To

1. The Secretary to Municipal Administration, and Water Supply Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Director of Town Panchayats, Kuralagam, Chennai 600 108.

3. The Executive Officer, Ilupur Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Pudukottai District.