← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18648/2013dismissed as infructuous

Krishnasamy @ Kistappa Naicker v. The Special Commissioner And

2022-09-29Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.09.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 in W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013 Krishnasamy @ Kistappa Naicker ... Petitioner in W.P.No.18648 of V.Malaisamy ... Petitioner in W.P.No.18649 of 2013 Vs.

1.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner Of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai - 600 005.

2.The District Collector, 3.The District Revenue Officer, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengleput, Page No.1 of 7

5.The Tahsildar, Thirukazhukundram Taluk, 6.The District Registrar, 7.The Sub Registrar, Thirukazhukundran, 8.Superintendent of Police, 9.The Inspector of Police, Sadras Police Station, Thirukazhukundram, 10.The Assistant Settlement Officer-North, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

11.V.Kamalakannan 12.K.Santhanakrishnan ... Respondents in both W.Ps PRAYER in W.P.No.18648 of 2013: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to act upon and pass orders on the petition dated 26.06.2013 submitted by the petitioner under Section 7(A) and 7(C) of the Tamil Nadu Estate (Abolition & Conversion Into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 Page No.2 of 7

challenging the order dated 21.10.2011 based on which the patta has been granted in favour of the 11th respondent within a time to be stipulated by this Court.

PRAYER in W.P.No.18649 of 2013: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to act upon and pass orders on the petition dated 19.06.2013 submitted by the petitioner under Section 7(A) and 7(C) of the Tamil Nadu Estate (Abolition & Conversion Into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 challenging the order dated 16.05.2011 based on which the patta has been granted in favour of the 11th respondent within a time to be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner :

Mr.Sundara Kameshmarthandan in both W.Ps For Respondents 1 to 10 :

Mr.U.Bharanidharan, in both W.Ps Additional Government Pleader For Respondent 11 :

Mr.M.Rajendran in both W.Ps For Respondent 12 :

M/s.S.Radha Gopalan in both W.Ps C O M M O N O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Page No.3 of 7

petitioners submitted that the matters have become infructuous and nothing survives in these writ petitions for further adjudication. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition today.

2. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, these Writ Petition are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 29.09.2022 vm Index :

Yes/No Speaking Order :

Yes/No Copy To:

1.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner Of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai - 600 005.

2.The District Collector, 3.The District Revenue Officer, Page No.4 of 7

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengleput, 5.The Tahsildar, Thirukazhukundram Taluk, 6.The District Registrar, 7.The Sub Registrar, Thirukazhukundran, 8.Superintendent of Police, 9.The Inspector of Police, Sadras Police Station, Thirukazhukundram, 10.The Assistant Settlement Officer-North, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

Page No.5 of 7

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

vm W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013 Page No.6 of 7

29.09.2022 Page No.7 of 7