Ponnankatti Gounder v. P.Chinnasamy

C.M.P.Nos.15330, 15331 and 15338 of 2021 in S.A.No.1306 of 2007 The first respondent P.Chinnasamy died. Notice to the respondents who are sought to be impleaded as the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent in all the three applications. Private notice is also permitted. Post after three weeks.

(1/7) 1/7

C.M.P.Nos.18047 of 2021, 18050 and 18091 of 2021 in S.A.No.1305 of 2007 Notice to the proposed parties, returnable by three weeks.

Private notice is also permitted.

(2/7) 2/7

C.M.P.No.18045 of 2021 in S.A.No.1305 of 2007 bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent Periyamma. Her legal representatives are already on record as respondents 4 to 6.

Hence, there is no question of abatement.

This petition is (3/7) Note to office:

Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title.

3/7

C.M.P.No.15336 of 2007 in S.A.No.1306 of 2007 bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent Periyamma. Her legal representatives are already on record as respondents 4 to 6.

Hence, there is no question of abatement. This petition is (4/7) Note to office:

Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title.

4/7

C.M.P.No.15334 of 2021 in S.A.No.1306 of 2007 record the legal representatives of the deceased 3rd respondent Periyamma.

Her legal representatives are already on record as respondents 4 to 6.

Hence, there is no question of abatement. This petition is (5/7) Note to office:

Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title.

5/7

C.M.P.No.18054 of 2021 in S.A.No.1305 of 2007 bring on record the respondents 4 to 6 as the legal representatives of the deceased 3rd respondent Periyamma. As the respondents are already on record no abatement occurs. Therefore, this petition is (6/7 ) 6/7

C.M.P.Nos.13785 and 13755 of 2016 in S.A.Nos.1305 and 1306 of 2007 This is the suit for Specific Performance. The 7th respondent herein is said to have purchased the property in Doc.No.3510/2016 dated 04.07.2016. Being a lis pendens purchaser though he is not a necessary party I consider the proper party to be impleaded.

Though notice was ordered to the 7th respondent on 16.09.2016 there is none to oppose this application.

In the light of the above, this petition is allowed.

(7/7) 7/7