← Library
Madras High CourtWP/12754/2005closed

The Management v. The Presiding Officer

2019-10-03Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.10.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.12754 and 12755 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.Nos.13965, 13966, 89 & 90 of 2005 W.P.No.12754 of 2005 The Management, Raj Intercontinental, 162, Linghi Chetty Street, Chennai - 600 001 ..Petitioner vs 1.The Presiding Officer, I Additional Labour Court, Chennai.

2.K.Meena ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the I Additional Labour Court (1st Respondent) Chennai in I.D.No.57/2000 dated 11.06.2004 and quash the award passed therein.

W.P.No.12755 of 2005 The Management, Raj Intercontinental, 162, Linghi Chetty Street, Chennai - 600 001 ..Petitioner vs 1.The Presiding Officer, I Additional Labour Court, Chennai.

2.K.Mari ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the I Additional Labour Court (1st Respondent) Chennai in I.D.No.58/2000 dated 11.06.2004 and quash the award passed therein.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ravi (in both W.Ps) For Respondent : R1 - Labour Court (in both W.Ps) R2 - Mr.K.Elango (in both W.Ps) C O M M O N O R D E R The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner made a submission that on account of efflux of time, he is unable to trace about the whereabouts of the Proprietor of the writ petitioner Hotel and he has not contacted him for several years.

2. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner has taken efforts to find out the whereabouts of the Proprietor of the writ petitioner hotel, and in spite of that, he is unable to secure informations regarding the Proprietor's residence or any other business place. Under these circumstances, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner is unable to get along with the cases and report no instructions.

3. In view of the fact that the learned counsel for the writ petitioner has made a submission that he has unable to get any further instructions to get along with the case, both the writ petitions stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To The Presiding Officer, I Additional Labour Court, Chennai.

+1 CC to Mr.K.Elango, Advocate sr 8446 W.P.Nos.12754 and 12755 of 2005 MP(CO) SP(11/11/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/