Natarajan, v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.12.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.19902 of 2010 Natarajan ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri Taluk & District.

3.Krishnamoorthi ... Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to enquire and consider the representation dated 30.06.2010 given by the petitioner to the first respondent.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.K.Bhuvaneswari, Additional Govt.Pleader for R1 and R2

O R D E R

When this writ petition was taken up on 30.11.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence this writ petition was directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS ) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar KM https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri Taluk & District.

+1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.NO. 83719 W.P.No.19902 of 2010 ASK(20/12/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/