A.Muralidhar v. The Secretary To Government
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 23.11.2022 Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA 1.A.Muralidhar 2.J.Sreerambabu 3.J.Rex Martin Sahayaraj 4.R.Rajendran 5.V.Gopalakrishnan 6.T.Purusothaman 7.V.Sumathy 8.K.Baskaran 9.A.M.Rafeek 10.V.Rajkumar 11.D.Shoba Rajkumar ... Petitioners Vs.
1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamilnadu, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Director of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai-600 025.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India 1 / 4
for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to G.O.514, Higher Education Department dated 14.12.2005 passed by the first respondent and quash the last portion of the G.O.514, Higher Education Department stating that the regularization period will be counted only for the limited purpose and consequently directing the respondents to give all the service benefits other than the monetary benefits to the petitioners from the date of their respective initial appointment and give monetary benefits from the date of their regularization on 02.05.1997. For Petitioners : Mr.N.C.Ashok Kumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to G.O.514, Higher Education Department dated 14.12.2005 passed by the first respondent and quash the last portion of the G.O.514, Higher Education Department stating that the regularization period will be counted only for the limited purpose and consequently directing the respondents to give all the service benefits other than the monetary benefits to the petitioners from the date of their respective initial appointment and give monetary benefits from the date of their regularization on 02.05.1997. 2 / 4
2. In the connected writ petition in W.P.No.19936 of 2010, orders are passed recording that the writ petitioners were given full benefits of career advancement, and therefore the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Hence this writ petition is also dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
23.11.2022 (2/2) Index:Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No dsn 3 / 4
N.MALA, J (dsn) To 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamilnadu, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Director of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai-600 025.
23.11.2022 (2/2) 4 / 4