← Library
Madras High CourtWP/37619/2004dismissed

B.Bhaskar v. The Tiruttani Cooperative

2019-09-19Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.09.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P. 37619 of 2004 and W.P.M.P. 45113 of 2004 B.Bhaskar ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Tiruttani Cooperative Sugar Mills Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District, rep. by its Administrator, Tiruvalangadu.

2. The Collector, Vellore District, Vellore-9.

3. The Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering with the movement of the petitioner's sugar cane in any manner including to areas outside the State of Tamil Nadu.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram for R1 Mr.I.Sathish, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R2 & R3

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction forbearing the respondents from interfering with the movement of the petitioners' sugarcane cultivated by them to the area outside the State of Tamil Nadu.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. This Writ Petition has been filed in the year 2004 and now, the prayer sought by the petitioners in the above Writ Petitions have become infructuous. However, in a similar circumstances, the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.680 of 2003 by an order dated 03.11.2004 had passed the following order :- "The relief claimed by the appellants relates to the year 2000-2001. Now that the season is over, this writ appeal has become infructuous. However, it is made clear that if in case a similar cause of action arises in future, this order shall not preclude the appellants/petitioners from ventilating their grievance. No costs."

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that a similar order may be passed in this Writ Petition.

3. In view of the above, this Writ Petition has been disposed of with the following order :- "The relief claimed by the appellants relates to the year 2004. Now that the season is over, these Writ Petitions have become infructuous. However, it is made clear that if, in case, a similar cause of action arises in future, this order shall not preclude the petitioners from ventilating their grievance." No costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Petition Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Administrator, Tiruttani Cooperative Sugar Mills Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvalangadu.

2. The Collector, Vellore District,Vellore.

3. The Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

+1 cc to The Government Pleader Sr.Nos.81571 and 81199 AKM/31.10.19/2P-5C / W.P. 37619 of 2004 and W.P.M.P. 45113 of 2004 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/