Amudha v. The Superintendent Of Polcie

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.12.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.Nos.15348 and 15349 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.Nos.16764 & 16766 of 2005 and 971 & 972 of 2006 Amudha ..Petitioner in both W.Ps Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Perambalur, Perambalur District.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirapalli City, Tiruchirapalli.

...Respondents

in both W.Ps Prayer in W.P.No.15348 of 2005 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari, to call for the records of the 1st respondent made in his proceedings D.O.No.185/05, C3 P.R.37/04 dated 31.03.2005 suspending the petitioner from her service and quash the same.

Prayer in W.P.No.15349 of 2005 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in his proceedings in Tha.Pa.No.C3/37/2004 dated 10.09.2004 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathish for Mr.S.Silambanan in both W.Ps For Respondents : Mr.P.Chinnadurai Additional Government Pleader in both W.Ps C O M M O N O R D E R The petitioner has come forward with these writ petitions to quash the proceedings of the first respondent dated 31.03.2005 and 10.09.2004.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that while the petitioner was working as Women Police Constable at Kairulabath Police Station, Ariyalur District, she was placed under suspension and charge memo was also issued. Subsequently, enquiry officer was appointed and after due enquiry the Disciplinary Authority by order dated 28.10.2013 imposed punishment of postponement of her next increment for six months which shall not affect her future increments. Thereafter, the petitioner approached the Department by way of filing a revision petition and the same was also rejected by the Department. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in these writ petitions.

3. Recording the above submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, these writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Perambalur, Perambalur District.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirapalli City, Tiruchirapalli.

+1cc to M/s.Silambanan, Advocate, S.R.No.39649 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.39797 W.P.Nos.15348 and 15349 of 2005 BP(CO) RRS(31/12/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/