← Library
Madras High CourtWP/21067/2010dismissed for nonprosecution

Chennai Port And Dock And Dock v. The Presiding Officer,

2023-01-04Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.01.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR Chennai Port and Dock and Dock Workers Congress[Regn.No.3631] Rep. by its General Secretary, Food Corporation of India Branch, No.87(45), Royapettah High Road, Chennai - 600 014.

...Petitioner

-Vs1.The Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Shasthri Bhavan, First Floor, Haddows Road, Chennai 600 006.

2.Food Corporation of India, Rep. by its General Manager, Regional Office, 5/51, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006.

...Respondents

Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records from the 1st respondent with regard to award dated 22.06.2010 in I.D.No.27 of 2009 and quash the same.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.C.S.Monica For R1 : Court For R2 : Mr.M.Imthias

O R D E R

When the matter was earlier listed on 02.01.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the writ petition under the caption "For Dismissal" today i.e. on 04.01.2023. 2.Despite the matter is listed today under the caption "For Dismissal", the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has produced before this Court a Memo dated 04.01.2023 to the effect that the learned counsel had already given Change of Vakalat in the writ petition. It is also stated by the learned counsel that the petitioner was informed about listing of case and that there was no response from the petitioner. The learned counsel has requested a direction from this Court to remove her name and to print the name of the petitioner. The submission made by the learned counsel in the Memo has been recorded. 3.Having regard to the nature of facts reported by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose will 2/4

be served by keeping this writ petition pending. The petitioner who had taken the papers from the learned counsel has failed to engage another learned counsel and the petitioner has to blame himself. 4.Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

04.01.2023 cda To 1.The Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Shasthri Bhavan, First Floor, Haddows Road, Chennai 600 006.

2.The General Manager, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, 5/51, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006.

S.S.SUNDAR . J., 3/4

cda 04.01.2023 4/4