← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18178/2015dismissed as infructuous

Mrs. Rani, v. The Commissioner,

2023-02-07Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.02.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR and W.M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 Rani .. Petitioner

Versus

The Commissioner, Athur Municipality, Athur, Salem District.

.. Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the respondent relating to the impugned order dated 13.05.2015 bearing Ref.No.394/2014/A4 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sai Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.N.Naveenkumar Government Advocate

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 13.05.2015 bearing Ref.No.394/2014/A4 on the file of the respondent. 1/3

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already demolished the construction made by him and restored the original condition. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication.

3. In such view of the matter, the prayer as sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

07.02.2023 ata Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No To The Commissioner, Athur Municipality, Athur, Salem District.

2/3

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

ata 07.02.2023 3/3