A. Arokiasamy, S/O. Aiyakannu v. The Additional Director Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.12.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.16252 of 2005 A.Arokiasamy

...Petitioner

vs The Additional Director of Agriculture (Personnel Management), Office of the Commissioner of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

... Respondent Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature of a writ, calling for the records of the Respondent, relating to the orders in (1) Pro.No.VCS3/27579/2005 dated 28.02.2005 and (2) Pro.No.VCS3/27579/2005 dated 28.02.2005, quash the same and issue directions that the Petitioner shall be deemed to have retired from service on 28.02.2005 without any condition and with all consequential benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent : M/s.R.Janaki

O R D E R

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer in the writ petition has already become infructuous and he had also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mrn https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Additional Director of Agriculture (Personnel Management), Office of the Commissioner of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

+1 cc to Mr.M.Ravi, Advocate, S.R.No.89003 W.P.No.16252 of 2005 PPA(CO) SSM(09/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/