D.Kumar v. The Secretary To Government,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 05.07.2022 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD D.Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

1.The Secretary to Government, Rural Development, Fort St.George, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner, Rural Development & Municipal Administration Department, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

3.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in proceeding Na.Ka.No.15798/2008/Pa.A4 dated 16.12.2009 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant on compassionate grounds. 1/4

For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondents :

Mr.S.Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

When the matter was called on earlier two occasions viz., 13.06.2022 & 27.06.2022, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption, "For Dismissal" on 01.07.2022.

2. Today (05.07.2022), this case is listed under the caption, "For Dismissal". Even today, when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss this petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 05.07.2022 mrr Index : Yes/No 2/4

To 1.The Secretary to Government, Rural Development, Fort St.George, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner, Rural Development & Municipal Administration Department, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

3.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

3/4

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

mrr 05.07.2022 4/4