← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/395/2015closed

T.Uthirakumaran v. The Deputy Superintendent Of

2015-03-02Honourable Mrs. Justice Aruna Jagadeesan,Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.03.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN H.C.P.No.395 of 2015 T.Uthirakumaran

...Petitioner/Father of the detenue

Vs 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tindivanam, Villupuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Tindivanam Town Police station, Tindivanam.

...Respondents

Prayer:- This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondents to produce the body and person of petitioner's daughter Ms.Bhuvaneshwari, aged about 23 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Veeraraghavan For Respondents :

Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Additional Public Prosecutor .

O R D E R

The matter was not listed today. However, since the Police has secured the alleged detenue, the Registry was directed to put up a special list.

2. The father of the alleged detenue has sought for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the respondents to produce the body and person of his daughter, Ms.Bhuvaneshwari, aged about 23 years, before this Court and set her at liberty.

3. According to the petitioner, his younger daughter, Bhuvaneshwari had studied upto 12th standard and after completing her studies, she was employed temporarily at Chennai. She was found https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

missing from 10.11.2014. Even after diligent search made by him in various places, she could not be traced. Hence, the petitioner lodged a complaint with the respondent Police on 11.10.2014 and a case in Crime No.407 of 2014 has been registered for "Woman Missing". Since no effective steps were taken by the respondent police to secure the detenue, he was constrained to file this Habeas Corpus Petition.

4. Today, the 2nd respondent police has produced the alleged detenue, Bhuvaneshwari. When she was enquired, she had stated that she had gone to Assam and she was secured by the police from the said place. She further stated that she was not illegally detained by anyone. She expressed her willingness to go along with the petitioner.

5. Considering the said submission made by the detenue, she is permitted to go with the petitioner as per her wish. Therefore, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed as no further order is necessary.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi To

1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tindivanam, Villupuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Tindivanam Town Police station, Tindivanam.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.

1 CC to Mr.P.Veeraraghavan, Advocate SR.No.

H.C.P.No.395 of 2015 GR (CO) PSI (20.03.2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/