Madras High CourtCONT P/460/2015closed

S.Sampath v. Vedachalam

2021-02-23Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Date : 23-02-2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Cont.P.No.460 of 2015 in W.P.No.1192 of 2004 S.Sampath ........ Petitioner/Petitioner -vs1. Mr.Vedhachalam, The District Educational Officer, Chengalpattu.

2. Virubakhashanada Secretary, Sri Ramakrishna Mission Vidhyalaya Boys Higher Secondary School, Chengalpattu.

..... Respondents/ 1st & 2nd Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of the order, dated 24.11.2010 made in W.P.No.1192 of 2004. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Narasimhan For Respondents : Mr.S.Suresh Kumar Govt. Advocate for R1 Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam for M/s. BFS Legal for R2 1/4

ORDER

This contempt petition has been filed for the alleged disobedience of the orders passed by this Court, dated 24.11.2010 made in W.P.No.1192 of 2004.

2. After several hearings, the matter has come up for hearing today also, where the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in respect of the calculation of the salary due payable to the petitioner, of course to some extent the interest for the belated payment, the second respondent Management having calculated the amount to the extent of Rs.4,01,383/- has given a Demand Draft dated 19.02.2021, which the petitioner's counsel has received and he would submit that, even though there is a sum of around Rs.40,000/- to 45,000/- still be the due towards the interest, on instructions from the petitioner, he would submit that the petitioner is ready and willing to forego the said amount. Therefore he would submit that, the orders of this Court can be treated as complied with fully.

3. The said position is also endorsed by the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent / Management. 2/4

4. In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after having received the Demand Draft for the aforesaid sum, which is treated as the full settlement, this Court feel that, there can be no further issue pending in this contempt petition.

5. Accordingly, recording the aforesaid development, this Contempt Petition is closed.

tsvn SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2021. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

To The District Educational Officer, Chengalpattu.

3/4