← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18879/2005closed

M. Pandurangan v. The Accountant General

2018-12-18Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.12.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No. 18879 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.20423 of 2005 M.Pandurangan ... Petitioner vs

1. The Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlements) Tamil Nadu, Chennai-600 018.

2. The Director of Fire Services, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in P22/4/P115-1382/RET/2004-2005/10783 dated 24.02.2005 and quash the same and direct the respondents to pay the DCRG to the petitioner with interest for the delayed payment.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Mageshkumar for Mr.P.Rajendran For Respondents : M/s.T.S.Selva Rani for R1 Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, GA for R2

O R D E R

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to quash the order of recovery and direct the respondents to pay the DCRG to the petitioner with interest.

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent / the Accountant General of Tamil Nadu, relying on the written instructions given by the senior Accounts officer / legal cell, informed this Court that the pensionary benefits of the petitioner were revised taking the pay last drawn of Rs.7425+s.p.40 and authorisation for the following benefits were issued by the the Accountant General of Tamil Nadu in proceedings dated 29.11.2007.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Accordingly, the pension amount of Rs.3733/- per month with effect from 1.8.2004 has been paid and the DCRG Rs. 1,95,459/- and the CVP Rs.1,56,147/- have also paid to the writ petitioner.

4. Thus, the grievances of the writ petitioner has already been redressed in Toto and therefore, no further consideration is required in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petition as the cause aroused became infructuous. 5.In view of the written instructions given by the learned counsel on behalf of the respondent, the writ petition stands closed. However, no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kak/kmm To

1. The Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlements) Tamil Nadu, Chennai-600 018.

2. The Director of Fire Services, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

W.P.No. 18879 of 2005 GP(CO) GSP(11/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/