← Library
Madras High CourtWP/19925/2012dismissed

M/S. Bharathi & Bharathi v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-12-06Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.12.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No. 19925 of 2012 M/s. Bharathi & Bharathi rep by its Partner, Mr.P.Kalimuthu, No. 19, Thiru.Va.Ka.Nagar North 2nd Street, College Road, Tiruppur - 641602 ..Petitioner Vs

1. The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Tiruppur North Police Station, Tiruppur.

2.R.Thangavel 3.E.Sakthivel 4.P.Krishnamurthi 5.M.Saravanakumar ..Respondents Prayer: writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to give adequate Police Protection to the petitioner Company by effectively preventing the respondents 2 to 5 and their associates so as to enable the petitioner to run the Industry with the willing workers thus enabling free ingress and egress of men material and vehicles to remove and transport the finished products from the petitioner's premises. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.J.C.Durairaj, AGP - R1 No Appearance - R2 to R5

O R D E R

The relief sought for in the writ petition is for a direction to the first respondent to give adequate Police Protection to the petitioner Company by effectively preventing the respondents 2 to 5 and their associates so as to enable the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioner to run the Industry with the wiling workers thus enabling free ingress and egress of men material and vehicles to remove and transport the finished products from the petitioner's premises.

2.No Appearance for the petitioner. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and perused materials available on record.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner-company has requested for police protection for ingress and egress of the respondents 2 to 5 in their unit. Now ten year has been lapsed, therefore at this distance point of time, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. The Additional Government Pleader has also fairly submitted that if the petitioner still has grievance, they can make necessary request before the first respondent and the same shall be considered in accordance with law.

4. In view of the above, this Court cannot grant the relief as sought for in the writ petition and nothing survives for adjudication after lapse of 10 years. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner that if necessary, the petitioner can approach the authorities concerned and seek remedy.

5. With the above liberty, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ak To The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Tiruppur North Police Station, Tiruppur.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.64844 W.P.Nos. 19925 of 2012 VG-II(CO) RGA(24/01/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/