R.Ramachandran v. Union Of India, Rep By Its
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated :: 30.01.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P. Nos.5619 OF 2004 and 38857 of 2006 W.P.No.5619 of 2004 1.R.RAMACHANDRAN ...Petitioner Vs 1.UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY-CUM-DIRECTOR GENERALOF POST MINISTRY OF POST NEW DELHI. 110 001.
2.THE CHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL, ANNA ROAD, CHENNAI.2.
3.R.VENU 4.M.KRISHNAMURTHI
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 31.12.2001 and 11.03.2002 according to section 72 of the Indian Post Office Act. W.P.No.38857 of 2006 1.R.RAMACHANDRAN
...Petitioner
Vs 1.UNION OF INDIA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY CUM DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POSTS, DEPT. OF POST DAK BHAWAN NEW DELHI-1.
2.THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL TAMIL NADU CIRCLE ANNA ROAD CHENNAI-2.
3.K.NEETHIPATHI 4.S.SUBBARAJAN 5.R.KUMARAGURU 6.R.VENU 7.V.KRISHNAMURTHY
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner representations dated 12.9.2005 12.10.2005 and 27.4.2006 as the case may be according to section 72 of the Indian Post Office Act 1898 and section 197 of the Criminal Code Procedure 1973 and further direct the respondent-1 to provide compensation Rs.10 lakhs and exemplary cost of Rs.2 Lakh to the petitioner for violating the Public Law duty and for performance of duty in the manner of arbitrary, capricious and oppressive by the respondents even after filed W.P.No.5619 of 2004 and that amount may be recovered from the respondents who are responsible for illegal torts.
For petitioner ... No appearance For respondents ... Mr.S.S.Meenakumary, C.G.S.C, for respondents 1 and 2 (WP 5619/2004) and Respondents 1 to 5 (WP No.38857/06) No appearance for other respondents COMMON ORDER When the Writ Petitions were listed for hearing on 28.1.2019, none appeared for the Writ Petitioner and the Registry was directed to list the matters on 29.1.2019 under the caption, "for dismissal". On 29.1.2019 also, there was no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner and in order to provide one more opportunity, the matter is posted today under the caption "for dismissal" 30.01.2019. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. Therefore, the Writ Petitions stand dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, W.P.M.P.No.2687 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tar To 1.THE SECRETARY CUM DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POSTS, DEPARTMENT OF POST, DAK BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-1.
2.THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL TAMIL NADU CIRCLE ANNA ROAD CHENNAI-2.
+1cc to Mr.S.S.Meenakumary, Advocate, S.R.No.8346 W.P. No.5619 OF 2004 VSN-II(CO) rrs 08/03/2019