← Library
Madras High CourtWP/23124/2010dismissed for nonprosecution

Association Of University v. Principal

2022-07-04Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 04.07.2022 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Association of University Teachers (AUT) PSG College of Technology Unit, Coimbatore - 641 004 Represented by its Secretary Dr.P.T.Vanathi

...Petitioner

Versus

1.Principal, 2.Chairman, Governing Council, Managing Trustee, PSG & Sons Charities, Coimbatore - 641 004.

3.Commissioner of Technical Education, Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai - 600 025. 4.Registrar, Anna University of Technology, Jothipuram, Coimbatore - 641 047.

5.Member Secretary, All India Council of Technical Education, 7th Floor, Chanderlok Building, Janpath, New Delhi - 110 001.

1/4

6.Dr.S.Jayakumar, Head of the Department of Physics,

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 to appoint only the faculty members in the aided service in the order of seniority in PSG College of Technology to the post of Head of the Department in all the aided Departments functioning in it. For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondents - 1, 2 & 6 :

Mr.A.Jenasenan For Respondent - 3 :

Mr.S.Ravichandran, Addl. Govt. Pleader For Respondent - 4 :

Mr.R.Sivakumar For Respondent - 5 :

Mrs.A.L.Gandhimathi

O R D E R

When the matter was called on earlier two occasions viz., 06.06.2022 & 28.06.2022, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption, "For Dismissal" on 30.06.2022.

2/4

2. Today (04.07.2022), this case is listed under the caption, "For Dismissal". Even today, when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner. But the respective learned counsels for the respondents were present before this Court. With an intention of giving one more opportunity to the petitioner, the matter was passed over and called again. Even when the matter was called again, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss this petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

04.07.2022 mrr Index : Yes/No 3/4

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

mrr To 1.Principal, 2.Chairman, Governing Council, Managing Trustee, PSG & Sons Charities, 3.Commissioner of Technical Education, Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai - 600 025.

4.Registrar, Anna University of Technology, Jothipuram, Coimbatore - 641 047.

5.Member Secretary, All India Council of Technical Education, 7th Floor, Chanderlok Building, Janpath, New Delhi - 110 001.

04.07.2022 4/4