← Library
Madras High CourtWA/892/2015disposed of

The General Manager (Hr) v. M.Manikandan

2015-07-01Honourable Mr Justice M. Venugopal,Honourable Mr Justice Satish K. Agnihotri3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 1/7/2015 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL W.A. Nos.892 and 893 of 2015 The General Manager (HR) Union Bank of India Central Office Union Bank Bhavan 239 Vidhan Bhavan Marg Mumbai 400 021.

...

Appellant in both the appeals Vs

1. M. Manikandan

2. The Institute of Banking Personnel Selection rep. By its Director IBPS House, D P Road Near Thakur Polytechnic Off Western Express Highway Post Box No.8587 Kandivali Mumbai 400 101.

3.The Registrar Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore 641 003.

...Respondents in both the

appeals Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order in M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 in W.P.No.16643 of 2015 dated 12/6/2015.

Petitions praying that in these circumstances stated therein and in the respective affidavits filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to (i) to grant an ad-interim stay of operation of the impugned order issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceesings in DP:REC: 3755:15 dated 26.5.2015 (in MP.1/15) pending disposal of thet above writ petition.

(ii)To grant an ad-interim direction directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in the mandatory induction training at Union Bank of India, Staff College, Bannerghatta Road, Kalkere Post, Bengalaru, Karnataka, (in MP.2/15) pending disposal of the above writ petition 16643/15 Petition preferred under Art.226 of the constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of writ calling for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in DP.REC:3755:15 dated 26.05.2015 and quash t he same as; For appellant : Mr.V.Karthik for M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co.

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was made by SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI,J.,) According to the learned counsel for the appellant, the impugned interim order was passed on the basis of the facts narrated by the writ petitioner. In fact, the writ petitioner is not continuing on his job as appointment order has already been withdrawn. The impugned order was passed at notice of motion stage. In view of foregoing, it is proper to reserve liberty to to the appellant to make an appropriate application for modification of the order before the learned Single Judge. If such an application is made, the same may be considered at the earliest.

2. These writ appeals stand disposed of accordingly. Connected M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2015 are closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mvs.

1. The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Agricaltural University, Coimbatore.

2. The General Manager (HR) Union Bank of India, Central Officer, Bhavan Marg, Mumbai 400 021-400021 + 1 cc to M/s. T.s. Gopalan, Advocate Sr.32370 W.A.Nos.892 and 893 of 2015 TEJ(CO) EU 13.07.15