G.Mohanrajan v. Government Of Tamilnadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.12.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU W.P.Nos.21441 & 31024 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.42834 of 2005 W.P.No.21441 of 2005 G.Mohanrajan .... Petitioner vs rep. by its Special Secretary .... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records connected with the impugned order of the first respondent in G.O.(D).No.730 Labour and Employment Department dated 13.05.2005 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the panel of Assistant fit for promotion as Junior Employment Officer for the year 2004-2005 in the appropriate place and promote the petitioner with retrospective effect from the date of promotion of the petitioner's immediate Junior with consequential 1/4

benefits.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Muthukumaran For respondents : Mr.S.Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader W.P.No.31024 of 2005 G.Mohanrajan .... Petitioner vs rep. by its Special secretary

3. M.A.Abubacker Siddique, Assistant, O/o District Employment Office, Tirunelveli.

4. V.S.Indra, Assistant, O/o Commissionerate of Employment & Training,

5. A.Jaganathan, Assistant, O/o District Employment Office, Krishnagiri.

.... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2/4

second respondent relating to Pro.No.Nir.3/26978/2005(1) dated 10.08.2005 and memo No.Nir.3/689/2005 dated 18.8.2005 and quash the same and issue consequential directions to include the name of the petitioner in the said panel for 2005-2006 for promotion as Junior Employment Officer without prejudice to the claim for inclusion of name in the panel for 2004-2005 and promotion and to promote the petitioner as Junior Employment Officer with consequential benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Muthukumaran For respondents : Mr.S.Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader for R1 COMMON ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner would state that the issue involved in these writ petitions has become infructuous and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

15.12.2022 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order vsi 3/4

J.NISHA BANU,J.

vsi To rep. by its Special Secretary

3. The Commissioner of Employment W.P.Nos.21441 & 31024 of 2005 15.12.2022 4/4