Naveen Kumar v. The Satate Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.02.2026 CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.2233 of 2026 Naveen Kumar ... Petitioner -vsState Rep by, Inspector of Police, Nolambur Police Station, Chennai (Crime No.389 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.389 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Nolambur Police Station, Chennai under Sections 115(2), 326(g), of BNS 2023 r/w Section 3 of Explosive Substances Act and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act 120(B) and pass orders. For Petitioner :
Mr.S. Gajapathi KRishnan For Respondent :
Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.12.2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 115(2), 326(g) of BNSS r/w Section 3 of Explosive Substances Act and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.389 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity the petitioner trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and thrown molotov cocktail and caused damages to the vehicle worth about Rs.30,000/- Hence, a complaint was registered and the petitioner was arrested. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in judicial custody from 19.12.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation and ready to abide by any other stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that totally there are 7 accused in this case. It is alleged that this petitioner along with other accused trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and thrown molotov cocktail and caused damages to the vehicle worth about Rs.30,000/-. He further submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and investigation in this case is almost completed. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.
2/6
6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and the nature of allegations and considering the period of his incarceration and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner , this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-Ambattur, Chennai , and on further conditions that: (a) the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.6,000/- (Rupees six Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.389 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-Ambattur, Chennai at the time of execution of sureties;
[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. 3/6
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 6300];
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
02.02.2026 smn Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.
4/6
To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Ambattur, Chennai 2.The Inspector of Police, Nolambur Police Station, Chennai 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
5/6
K. RAJASEKAR, J.
smn Crl.O.P.No.2233 of 2026 02.02.2026 6/6