← Library
Madras High CourtWP/19367/2013dismissed as infructuous

Shri.R.M.Annamalai v. Competition Commission

2020-08-12Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.08.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P.Nos.19367 & 19239 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 in W.P.No.19367 of 2013 M.P.Nos.1 to 5 of 2013 in W.P.No.19239 of 2013 (Heard through VC) Shri.R.M.Annamalai, President, The Tamil Nadu Film Exhibitors Association, Dr. Maligai No.2 (Old No.16), Poes Road, III Street, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.

... Petitioner in WP No.19367/2013 Shri R.Paneerselvam, General Secretary, S/o.Shri Ramavelu Chettiar, The Tamilnadu Film Exhibitors Association, Dr. Maligai No.2 (Old No.16), Poes Road, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.

... Petitioner in WP No.19239/2013 Vs

1. Competition Commission of India, Rep. by Secretary, Hindustan Times House (3rd 4th and 7th floor) 18-20 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110 001.

2. Raaj Kamal Film International, Old No.172, New No.4, Eldams Road, Alwarpet, Chennai-18.

... Respondents in WP No.19367/2013 Competition Commission of India, Hindustan Times House (3rd 4th and 7th floor) 18-20 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110 001.

... Respondent in WP No.19239/2013 * * * 1/3

Prayer in W.P.No.19367/2013: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent in the order F.No.DG/CCI/IW/ 1/27/2012 (Case No.1 of 2013) /2560 dated 04.07.2013 and quash the same.

Prayer in W.P.No.19239/2013: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order F.No. DG/CCI/IW/1/27/2012 (Case No.1/2013)/2561 dt 4.7.2013 on the file of the respondent. * * * For Petitioner in :

Mr.Nithyaesh Natraj both Wps For R1 in :

Mr.P.Mahaadevan both Wps Senior Central Government Standing Counsel For R2 in W.P.No.19367/2013 :

Served - No appearance C O M M O N O R D E R It is stated by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent that the dispute between the parties have been amicably resolved and nothing worthwhile survives for adjudication in this matter.

2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, these Writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar asr/rsi 2/3

To The Secretary, Competition Commission of India, Hindustan Times House (3rd 4th and 7th floor), 18-20 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110 001.

W.P.Nos.19367 & 19239 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 in W.P.No.19367 of 2013 M.P.Nos.1 to 5 of 2013 in W.P.No.19239 of 2013 pa(co) aa29/09/2020 3/3