Madras High CourtWP/20702/2018disposed of

M.Subbulakshmi,S/O.Mariyappan v. The Managing Director

2018-08-11Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.08.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.20702 of 2018 & W.M.P.No.24327 of 2018 M.Subbulakshmi ... Petitioner vs.

1 The Managing Director 2 The Secretary cum Works Manager 3 The Administrative Engineer ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 27.07.2018 and subsequently to execute the sale deed vide plot bearing No.107, situated at Mahakavi Bharathi Nagar, Ambattur Chennai-600 053. measuring an extent of 72.31 square meters in favour of the petitioner herein within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Elumalai For Respondent : Mr.M.Rajasekar Standing Counsel

ORDER

Mr.r.M.Rajasekar, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition itself is

taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to consider and pass orders on her representation dated 27.07.2018 and subsequently to execute the sale deed in respect of plot bearing No.107, situated at Mahakavi Bharathi Nagar, Ambattur Chennai-600 053. measuring an extent of 72.31 square meters in her favour.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's representation dated 27.07.2018, the 2nd respondent has not passed any order so far. Therefore, the 2nd respondent may be directed to pass orders on the petitioner's representation, as expeditiously as possible.

4. The learned Standing Counsel, appearing for the respondents submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation in accordance of law.

5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.07.2018 and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Rj To 1 The Managing Director

2 The Secretary cum Works Manager 3 The Administrative Engineer +1cc to Mr.N.Elumalai, Advocate, S.R.No.55246 +1cc to Mr.M.Raja Sekhar, Advocate, S.R.No.55286 W.P.No.20702 of 2018 & W.M.P.No.24327 of 2018 KS(CO) GSP(30/08/2018)