J.Jose Roy v. Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.No.2892 of 2024 Crl.O.P.No.2892 of 2024 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 3(2)(a), 4(1), 5(1)(a), 6(1)(a) and 7(1)(a) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, in Crime No.19 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner/A1 and other accused person were involved in the immoral activities. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against him. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner and other accused person had involved in the immoral activities. He would also submit that four previous cases are pending against the petitioner which are similar in nature. It is also stated that at every time, he uses a different names like, Ranjith @ Ranjith Ragav @ Siva @ Sivakumar @ Pradeep Raj @ Jose Joy.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.2892 of 2024 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

vsg

5. The earlier petition seeking anticipatory bail had been dismissed in Crl.O.P.No. 29144 of 2023 by an order dated 28.12.2023. There are no change in circumstance. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

13.02.2024 vsg Crl.O.P.No.2892 of 2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis