Estate Officer v. C.Sivagnanam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR CRP PD No.1528 to 1532 of 2011 and M.P.No.1+4 of 2011 Estate Officer, Military Station, Station Head Quarters, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

... Petitioner in all revision petitions Vs.

C.Sivagnanam ... Respondent in CRP No.1528/2011 R.Kannan .... Respondent in CRP No.1529/2011 S.Vani ... Respondent in CRP No.1530/2011 M.A.Hanifa ... Respondent in CRP No.1531/2011 A.Veerasamy ... Respondent in CRP No.1532/2011 Prayer in CRP No.1528 of 2011 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 30.10.2010 passed in I.A.No.11832 of 2009 in O.S.No.5309 of 2009 by the XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

Prayer in CRP No.1529 of 2011 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 30.10.2010 passed in I.A.No.13719 of 2009 in O.S.No.5967 of 2009 by the XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. Prayer in CRP No.1530 of 2011 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 30.10.2010 passed in I.A.No.19975 of 2009 in O.S.No.5966 of 2009 by the XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. Prayer in CRP No.1531 of 2011 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 30.10.2010 passed in I.A.No. 22181 of 2009 in O.S.No.5968 of 2009 by the XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. Prayer in CRP No.1532 of 2011 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 30.10.2010 passed in I.A.No.22672 of 2009 in O.S.No.5965 of 2009 by the XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

In all CRPs For Revision Petitioner : No appearance.

For Respondent : Mr.L.Muralikrishnan C O M M O N O R D E R When the revision petitions are listed today, there is no representation for the revision petitioner. All the revision petitions have been filed against the order of the trial court, dismissing the application, filed to reject the plaint.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents would contend that, subsequent to the suit, there was a proceedings to evict the respondents, against which civil revision petitions had been filed by them before this court and the same were allowed vide order of this court dated 11.04.2018 in CRP (PD) Nos.2888 to 2892 of 2014.

3. In any event, there is no representation for the revision petitioner. Hence all the revisions petitions are dismissed. No costs. The connected civil miscellaneous petitions are closed. 14.03.2019 Index : yes/no Internet : yes/no Speaking order/non-speaking order mst

N.SATHISH KUMAR. J., mst To The XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

CRP PD No.1528, 1529, 1530, 1531 and 1532 of 2011 and M.P.No.1+4 of 2011 14.03.2019