← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2593/2010disposed of

Mrs.Lalitha Ramesh Murthy v. State Of Tamilnadu

2019-01-08Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh,Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.01.2019 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.2593 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 Lalitha Ramesh Murthy ...

Petitioner Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary, Adi Dravida Tribal and Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The District Vigilance Committee on Community Verification (3 Members Committee), Office of the Collector of Chennai, Chennai - 1.

3.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., rep. by its Chief General Manager, 78, Purasawalkam High Road, Chennai - 10.

..

Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the proceedings of the second respondent District Vigilance Committee on Community Verification, Chennai bearing Ref.No.Vu3/20750/97 dated 02.12.2006 signed on 12.03.2007 consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore/issue a certificate to the petitioner as "SHOLAGA" ST Community.

For Petitioner ..

Mr.A.Ilayaperumal For Respondents..

Ms.A.Sri Jayanthi, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 R3 - No appearance

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) Challenging the proceedings of the second respondent dated 02.12.2006 and for a consequential direction to respondents 1 and 2 to restore/issue a certificate to the petitioner as "SHOLAGA" ST Community, the present writ petition has been filed. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2.

3.Though the matter is pending for quite number of years, we are not inclined to go into the merits of the case as the petitioner has got appellate remedy. This Court can only go into the decision making process as against the decision. Therefore, the writ petition stands disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to exhaust the remedy before the appellate authority. The petitioner shall make an appeal within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As and when such an appeal is filed, the appellate authority shall dispose it of on merits, without rejecting the same on the ground of limitation. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mmi To 1.The Secretary to Government, Adi Dravida Tribal and Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The District Vigilance Committee on Community Verification (3 Members Committee), Office of the Collector of Chennai, Chennai - 1.

3.The Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., 78, Purasawalkam High Road, Chennai - 10.

+1cc to Mr.K.M.Ramesh, Advocate Sr.2067 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.2746 +1cc to Mr.Manoj Sreevalsan, Advocate sr.1785 W.P.No.2593 of 2010 srg 27/02/2019