Rajalakshmi v. The Authorised Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.12.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.26766 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.29207 of 2005 & W.V.M.P.No.2248 of 2005 Tmt.Rajalakshmi

...Petitioner

vs 1.The Authorised Officer Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Trichy 2.The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Chidambaram - 608 001 Cuddalore District.

...Respondents

Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pursuant to the tender notification dated 06.08.05 issued by the paper publication in so far as the item No.1 is concerned and quash the same, and directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to make the payment of overdues as per the proceedings in RO/TRY/RECV/0405/02 dated 08.04.05 issued by the first respondent within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court for regularizing the account.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Hariharan

O R D E R

Since the issues involved in the present writ petition is in connection with the loan obtained by the petitioner and the actions being taken under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, the writ petition cannot be entertained. The writ petitioner is at liberty to approach the appropriate Forum for the redressal of his grievances in the manner known to law. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. With these observations, the writ petition stands closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar W.P.No.26766 of 2005 pp[co] srg 24/01/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/