M.Rangasamy v. Appachi @ Appaji

plaintiff / appellant. Therefore these C.M.P. No.3110 of 2021 in S.A. No.1765 of 2003 interse disputes, need not be decided at the present stage. Hearing all the parties P.B. BALAJI, J.

in the second appeal would suffice and This application has been filed to the interests of all the parties would stand implead the respondents 4 to 10 as protected. Hence the C.M.P. No.3110 of respondents.

2021 is ordered.

The application has been filed by Post the matter on 22.09.2023 the applicant on the ground that the under the caption "for further respondents 4 to 10 are presently arguments".

interested in the subject property. In so 08.09.2023 mjs far as the respondents 4 to 8, there is no objection for allowing this impleading petition. However the other respondent no.9, who is the legal heir of the respondents 1 and 2, opposed the said application on the ground that he is the legal heir as an adopted daughter. On this score, he has opposed the application for impleading the other respondents in the second appeal. The suit is for specific performance of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis agreement of sale at the instance of the