K. Anitha v. The Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 22.10.2019 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.26783 of 2010 K.Anitha

...Petitioner

Versus

1.The Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

3.The Tahsildar, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records of the second respondent vide its proceedings in OO.MU.5672/09/P dated 04.12.2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to grant priority certificate to the petitioner.

For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondents :

Mr.M.Elumalai, Government Advocate

O R D E R

When the matter came up for hearing on 21.10.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the matter was adjourned to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 22.10.2019 i.e., today.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

3.The Tahsildar, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.88700 W.P.No.26783 of 2010 ad[co] srg 29/11/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/