← Library
Madras High CourtWA/1574/2017withdrawn dismissed

S.Sakthivel v. The Managing Director

2017-11-29Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr Justice Rajiv Shakdher2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.11.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.A.Nos.1574 and 1575 of 2017 And C.M.P.Nos.20780 to 20783 of 2017 S.Sakthivel ... Appellant/Petitioner in W.A.No.1574 of 2017 S.Ramanathan ... Appellant in W.A.No.1575 of 2017 Vs.

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

2.The District Manager, TASMAC - Thirumalizai - Unit-III, No.1, Bangalore National Highways, Chembarambakkam, Thiruvallur District - 602 103.

... Respondents/Respondents in both the appeals Common Prayer:

Writ appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 23.11.2017 made in W.P.Nos.30027 and 30193 of 2017 (Batch) respectively. WP.No.30027 of 2017 and WP.No.30193 of 2017:Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for records from the file of the 2nd respondent in Tender Notification Na.Ka. No.R8/652/2017 dated 03.11.2017 published in Dinamani Tamil Daily Newspaper on 05.11.2017 and quash the same.

For Appellants : Mr.Gnanadesikan Senior Counsel for M/s.Gnanadesikan Law Asso.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.) 1.The learned counsel for the appellants says, that there were certain other issues, raised before the learned Single Judge, that is, issues, essentially, pertaining to GST, which have not been dealt with, in the impugned judgment. 2.According to us, in such a situation, the only remedy, that the appellants, can avail of, is to approach the learned Single Judge.

3.Accordingly, the learned counsel for the appellants seek to withdraw the writ appeals to approach the learned Single Judge, by way of an appropriate remedy, albeit, in accordance with law.

3.1.An endorsement, to that effect, has, also been made, by the learned counsel for the appellants.

4.Consequently, the writ appeals are dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed. Connected pending petitions are, accordingly closed. No costs.

pri Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

2.The District Manager, TASMAC - Thirumalizai - Unit-III, No.1, Bangalore National Highways, Chembarambakkam, Thiruvallur District - 602 103.

+2cc to M/s.Gnanadesikan Law Associates, SR.No.85211 +1cc to Mr.P.Arumigarajan, Advocate Sr.No.84707 W.A.Nos.1574 and 1575 of 2017 And C.M.P.Nos.20780 to 20783 of 2017 GJ(CO) sm:3.1.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/