N. Balan v. Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23-03-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WA No. 1930, 1932 & 1933 of 2023 N. Balan Son of Late Natarajan, Residing at No.6, Villianur Main Road, Arumparthapuram, Puducherry-605 ..Appellant(s) Vs
1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Highways Department, New Delhi
3. The Deputy Collector (Revenue) South-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) South, Villianur ..Respondent(s) WA No. 1932 of 2023 N.Selvaraj Son of Late Natarajan, Residing at No.6, Villianur Main Road, Arumparthapuram, Puducherry-605 ..Appellant(s) Vs
1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Highways Department, New Delhi.
3. The Deputy Collector(Revenue) South-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) South, Villianur.
..Respondent(s) WA No. 1933 of 2023 N.Murugasamy, Son of Late Natarajan, Residing at No.6, Villianur Main Road, Arumparthapuram, Puducherry-605 ..Appellant(s) Vs
1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Highways Department, New Delhi
3. The Deputy Collector (Revenue) South-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) South, Villianur ..Respondent(s) To set aside the Order dated 13.09.2022 passed in WP.No. 2502/2016 and consequently allow the WP.No. 2502/2016 WA No. 1932 of 2023 To set aside the order dt.13.09.2022 passed in W.P.No. 2504/2016.
WA No. 1933 of 2023 To set aside the order dated 13.09.2022 passed in
WP.no.2503/2016 and consequently allow the WP.No.2503/2016. For Appellant(s):
T. Sai Krishnan For Respondent(s):
Na For R1 And R2 Dr B Ramasamy Agp For Puduchery COMMON
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Under assail is the writ order dated 13.09.2022 passed in W.P.Nos.2502, 2024 & 2503 of 2016 respectively.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants would mainly contend that the writ Court has not granted the compensation, but granted only interest.
3. Paragraph No.8 of the writ order dated 13.09.2022 reads as under: 8.In view of the above, this Court directs the respondents to pay the compensation amount to the petitioners with applicable interest in terms of Section 30(4) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If any benefit is extended to similarly situated persons, the same may be extended to these petitioners also, subject to the confirmation of the same, by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court .
W.P.Nos.2502 to 2504 of 2016 or by any other Appellate Court.
4. The above portion of the order would clarify that the writ court directed the respondents to pay compensation amount along with the applicable interest in terms of the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. That apart, the writ court has further granted the benefit, if any, extended to similarly situated persons. That being the order of the writ court, the apprehension raised by the appellants is baseless. Thus, the Writ Appeals stand dismissed. No costs.
(S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 23-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VSI To
1. The Secretary to Government, Union of India, Highways Department, New Delhi
3. The Deputy Collector (Revenue) South-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) South, Villianur
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.
AND K.SURENDER J.
VSI WA No. 1930, 1932 & 1933 of 2023 23-03-2026