Sarala, v. B.Ranganathan,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 24.06.2019 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice R.HEMALATHA C.R.P.Nos.1949, 1950, 1951, 1953 and 1954 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 Sarala ... Petitioner (Petitioner in all CRPs) Vs.
B.Ranganathan ... Respondent (Respondent in all CRPs) PRAYER IN C.R.P.No.1949 OF 2011 This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 15.03.2011 passed in I.A.No.19 of 2011 in O.S.No.4006 of 2007 by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Chennai.
PRAYER IN C.R.P.No.1950 OF 2011 This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 17.03.2011 passed in I.A.No.21 of 2011 in O.S.No.4006 of 2007 by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, City Civil Court, Chennai.
PRAYER IN C.R.P.No.1951 OF 2011 This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 17.03.2011 passed in I.A.No.22 of 2011 in O.S.No.4006 of 2007 by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, City Civil Court, Chennai.
PRAYER IN C.R.P.No.1953 OF 2011 This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 01.04.2011 passed in I.A.No.24 of 2011 in O.S.No.4006 of 2007 by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, City Civil Court, Chennai.
PRAYER IN C.R.P.No.1954 OF 2011 This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the Order dated 15.03.2011 rejecting the Petitioner's memo in O.S.No.4006 of 2007 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Harikrishnan (in all CRPs) For Respondents : No appearance
C O M M O M O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submits that he is not pressing the civil revision petitions and he also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the submission and also the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.
24.06.2019 rrg Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non Speaking order To The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, City Civil Court, Chennai.
R.HEMALATHA.J., rrg CRP.(NPD)Nos.1949, 1950, 1951 1953 and 1954 of 2011 24.06.2019