Madras High CourtWP/5255/2026disposed of

C.Mohan Raj v. The Tahsildar

2026-02-23Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-02-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

1. C.Mohan Raj Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Tahsildar Perambur Taluk Office, Chennai District.

Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 05.11.2025 and 08.11.2025 and consequently to issue a correlation certificate by correcting the survey number in the online revenue records as Survey No.43/2 instead of Survey No.53/2, in respect of (i) the property covered under Sale Deed No.3695 of 1980 bearing survey No.43/2, T.S. No.55, presently T.S. No.55/3 situated at Perambur, and (ii) the property covered under Salem deed No.3694 of 1980 bearing survey No.43/2, T.S. No.55, presently T.S. No. 55/2, situated at Perambur, Chennai within such time frame as may be fixed by this Honourable Court For Petitioner(s):

M/s.A.Jagadeeswari For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For Respondent

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to issue correlation certificate by correcting the survey number in the online revenue records for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition

within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the aforesaid property. He has sought for correlation certificate by correcting the survey number in the online revenue records from the respondent through his representations dated 05.11.2025 and 08.11.2025. Since the said representations have not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the petitioner's representations as stated supra are considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representations.

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representations dated 05.11.2025 and 08.11.2025, seeking for correlation certificate by correcting the survey number in the online revenue records for the

property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 23-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To 1.The Tahsildar Perambur Taluk Office, Chennai District.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.

ab 23-02-2026