Pachaiammal, v. Muthulakshmi,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.08.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA and M.P.No. 1 of 2011 Pachaiammal ... Petitioner vs.

1.Muthulakshmi 2.Jayanthi 3.Jaya 4.Minor Venkatesan S/o.Subramanian Represented by mother and guardian, 1st respondent, Muthulakshmi ...Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the fair and decreetal orders dated 03.11.2010 in IA.No.409 of 2010 in OS.No.118 of 2003 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Viruthachalam.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance 1/4

O R D E R

A perusal of the earlier orders passed by this court shows that on 06.08.2019, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner reported no instructions for the revision petitioner and therefore, the Registry was directed to issue notice to the revision petitioner and accordingly notice was sent. However, today ie., 28.08.2019, there is no appearance on behalf of the revision petitioner.

2. In the facts and circumstances, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

28.08.2019 mbi Index : Yes/No 2/4

To The Additional Subordinate Judge, Viruthachalam.

3/4

R.HEMALATHA, J.

mbi and M.P.No. 1 of 2011 28.08.2019 4/4