← Library
Madras High CourtWP/24445/2011dismissed

P.Sivakumar, No.3/452 v. The District Employment

2023-08-17Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.08.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and M.P.Nos.1 & 4 of 2011 and 1 of 2014 P.Sivakumar .....

Petitioner Vs

1. The District Employment Officer, The District Employment Office, Kamraj Road, Karur.

2. The Commissioner, The Commissionerate of Employment and Training, Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

3. The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

.....

Respondents Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as a secondary grade teacher as per the order of the 3rd respondent in TRB REF:5015/A4/2008 DT8/10/09 dated 08.10.2009 and to consider the petitioner as a secondary grade teacher from the month of December, 2009.

For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr. M. Muthusamy Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.R.Siddharth Government Advocate

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as a secondary grade teacher as per the order of the 3rd respondent in TRB REF:5015/A4/2008 DT8/10/09 dated 08.10.2009 and to consider the petitioner as a secondary grade teacher from the month of December, 2009.

2. Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. There is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is inclined to pass orders on merits in this writ petition.

3. The petitioner is a physically challenged person and after completion of his Secondary Grade Teacher training, he registered his name in the first respondent office. Thereafter, he had married one Uma Maheswari in the year 2002, who originally belongs to Scheduled Caste. Therefore, the petitioner has been brought under the priority list by the

first respondent. However, the petitioner was not called for certificate verification under the category of intercaste marriage priority.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that though the petitioner had married a Scheduled Caste woman, he failed to register that he belongs to intercaste marriage priority. Therefore, the petitioner was not called for certificate verification.

5. In view of the above, the request made by the petitioner cannot be considered. Thus, the writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

17.08.2023 Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Lpp G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Lpp To

1. The District Employment Officer, The District Employment Office, Kamraj Road, Karur.

2. The Commissioner, The Commissionerate of Employment and Training, Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

3. The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

and M.P.No.1 of 2011 17.08.2023