Madras High CourtWP/24632/2011dismissed

E.Tamil Selvi, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2023-08-17Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.08.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.24632 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2011 E.Tamil Selvi .....

Petitioner Vs

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Higher Education, Fort.St.George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to School Education, Fort.St.George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

3. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Commercial Tax Annexe Building, No.1, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006.

4. The Registrar, University of Madras, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

5. The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University, Lady Willington Campus, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

6. Rehabilitation Counsil of India, B-22, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi - 110 016.

7. The Chairman (Member-Secretary), Teachers Recruitment Board, EVK Sampath Maligai, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

....

Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 7th respondent to include the name of the petitioner as selected BT Assistant, selected by the Teachers Recruitment Board under the Government Schools and Corporation Schools. (Prayer amended as per order dated 21.11.2011 by KSAJ in M.P.No.4 of 2011 in W.P.No.24632 of 2011) For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.R.Bharanidharan Standing Counsel For R5 : Ms.S.Buvaneswari Standing Counsel For R7 : Mr.R.Siddharth Government

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing directing the 7th respondent to include the name of the petitioner as BT Assistant, selected by the Teachers Recruitment Board under the Government Schools and Corporation Schools.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either sider and perused the materials available on record.

3. It is seen that now, the recruitment process has been changed and the petitioner ought to have passed the teacher eligibility test for any post. That apart, already the selection process was over. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition cannot be considered. Thus, the writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. 17.08.2023.

Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Lpp