Madras High CourtWP/3653/2019disposed of

M.Rajamanickam, v. The Special Tahsildar

2019-02-07Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.02.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.3653 of 2019 M.Rajamanickam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition), Inner Ring Road Scheme, Guindy Industrial Estate, Chennai 600 032.

2.The Secretary, Balaji Nagar Government Employees'

Welfare and House Site Society, No.4, Sakthi Nagar Extension, Adambakkam, Chennai 600 088.

... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent herein to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 19.11.2018 given by the petitioner herein. For Petitioner : Mr.Bhagavath Krishnan for Mr.Srinath Sridevan For Respondents: Mr.D.Raja, Additional Government Pleader for R1

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent herein to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 19.11.2018 given by the petitioner.

2. According to the petitioner, he purchased a property situated at Puzhdhiwakkam Village from one Mr.Udayakumar, vide Sale Deed dated 22.01.1992 bearing Doc.No.122/1992. The said property was acquired by the first respondent for the purpose of formation of inner ring road. But, so far as the petitioner has not received any compensation from the first respondent. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation dated 19.11.2018 ,to the first respondent for payment of compensation. Since no action was forthcoming, the petitioner is before this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent would submit that the petitioner has not furnished the particulars for non payment of the compensation, along with his representation. If the petitioner furnishes all the particulars with the representation, the same would be considered by the first respondent, in accordance with law.

4. By considering the submissions of the learned counsel on both sides, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation along with all particulars to the first respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If such representation being made, the first respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible.

5. With the above observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gsk To The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition), Inner Ring Road Scheme, Guindy Industrial Estate, Chennai 600 032.

+1cc to Mr.Srinath Sridevan, Advocate, S.R.No.12001 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.11353 W.P.No.3653 of 2019 KJI(CO) rrs 06/03/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/