Chennai Airport Contract v. Government Of India,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 07.07.2022 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and M.P.No.1 of 2010 Chennai Airport Contract Workers' Union Represented by its Secretary, Regd. No.61/KPM 72 A, M.G.R.Street, Karunanidhi Nagar, Ullagaram, Chennai - 600 091.

...Petitioner

Versus

1.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Shram Mantralaya, New Delhi - 110 001.

2.The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) - I, 26, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhavan, Chennai - 600 006.

3.Airports Authority of India, Rep. by its Airport Director, Chennai Airport, Chennai - 600 027.

1/6

4.Nav Bharat Enterprises, Rep. by its Proprietor, Mr.E.Ranjith Madhavan, No.2, Ganesan Street, Krishna Nagar, Pammal, Chennai - 600 075.

5.M/s.Karnataka Aviation Support Services, Private Limited, No.1233, 15th Main Road, BTM Lay Out, II Stage, Bangalore - 560 076.

6.Garuda Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Regional Manager, Mr.Parminder Singh Anand, No.142, Garuda House, Upper Govind Nagar, Malad (E), Mumbai - 400 097.

(R6 was impleaded as per order dated 02.07.2012 made in M.P.No.1 of 2012)

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents 3 to 5 from altering the service conditions of the members of the petitioner union, whose names are given in the annexure to this affidavit in any manner including discontinuance of service without getting permission under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in the industrial disputes, raised regarding regularization of the employees shown in the Annexure to the affidavit which is pending conciliation before the second respondent as dispute No.M.8/63/2010-B3 and further direct the 2/6

conciliation officer viz., 2nd respondent to conciliate and effect settlement and if no settlement is forthcoming to submit failure report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act and in turn direct the Government to refer the dispute for adjudication before the competent adjudicator, award costs.

For Petitioner :

Mr.Balan Haridas For Respondents - 1 & 2 :

Mr.C.V.Ramachandramoorthy Respondent - 3 :

Mr.Father Xavier Arulraj, Standing Counsel Respondent - 4 :

Court Notice was returned with the postal endorsement, 'Refused'

Respondent - 5 :

Mr.G.Vinodhkumar Respondent - 6 :

Mr.S.Santhan

O R D E R

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also sent a letter to the Registry to that effect. 3/6

2. Considering the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner coupled with the letter sent by him to the Registry, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.07.2022 mrr Index : Yes/No 4/6

Copy to 1.The Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Shram Mantralaya, New Delhi - 110 001.

2.The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) - I, 26, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhavan, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The Airport Director, Airports Authority of India, Chennai Airport, Chennai - 600 027.

5/6

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

mrr 07.07.2022 6/6