← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2867/2010disposed of

J.Balaji v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2018-12-07Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.12.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.2867 of 2010 and W.M.P.No.24293 of 2018 1.J.Balaji 2.J.Balamurugan ...

Petitioners Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.

2.The Tahsildar, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District.

3.K.Jayaraj Mudaliar 4.T.,Nagammal 5.B.Venkatesan (R3 to R5 impleaded as per order dated 23.03.2010 in M.P.No.1 of 2010 in W.P.No.2867 of 2010).

(This writ petition has been dismissed against R3 to R5 as per order dated 24.08.2016 in W.P.No.2867 of 2010).

...

Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.1570/2009/Aa 2 dated 25.12.2009 and quash the same and direct the respondent to issue patta to the petitioners for the land to an extent of Ac 0.93 cents comprised in S.Nos.62/1 and 62/2A situated at Senthamangalam Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.M. Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh, AGP for R1 and R2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

When this writ petition was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer to direct the respondents to consider his representation for issuance of patta, after due notice to the parties concerned. Since the said prayer seems to be reasonable, this Court is inclined to grant the same.

2.At this juncture, the learned Additional Govt.Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 has submitted that no representation has been received from the petitioner in respect of the prayer made in the writ petition.

3.In view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to submit a representation to the respondents 1 and 2 enclosing all the relevant documents within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such filing, the respondents 1 and 2 shall consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders, after affording due opportunity to all the parties concerned within a period of four weeks therefrom.

4.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar KM To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.

2.The Tahsildar, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District.

+1 CC to Mr.K.M.Ramesh, advocate sr 84751.

+1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 85433 W.P.No.2867 of 2010 and W.M.P.No.24293 of 2018 AK(CO) SP(04/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/