S.Arjunan v. The District Revenue Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :24.01.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.30603 of 2005 and MP.No.33492 of 2005 S.Arjunan ..Petitioner vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Cuddalore.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore.

3. The Tahsildar, Vridhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore.

4. Dhanavel

5. Malliga

6. Radha

7. Anjalai

8. Annnamalai

9. Sundari

10. Senthil

11. Vijayalakshmi

12. Saroja

13. Indirani .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent passed in No.V3/46883/2003 dated 09.09.2004 confirmed the order of the 2nd respondent passed in Na.Ka.No.A3/42/2003 dated 01.07.2003 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the patta issued in favour of the respondents 4 to 13 by the 3rd respondent. For Petitioner :Mr.A.Chandra for M/s.T.P.Kanimozhi For Respondents: Mr.G.B.Rajesh Govt. Advocate for R1 - R3 for R4-R11 Mr.T.Sivagnana Sambandam for R12 & R13 No appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the writ petitioner states that the writ petitioner passed away and therefore, no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition. Thus, the writ petition stands closed. No Costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Pkn To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Cuddalore.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore.

3. The Tahsildar, Vridhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore.

+1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.NO. 6504 W.P.No.31223 of 2005 A.SK(22/02/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/