Madras High CourtSA/1312/1999dismissed for default

Pathullah v. Ajeema Bi Ammal

2017-02-17Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.02.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN S.A.No.1312 of 1999 Pathullabi ... Appellant/Defendant Vs.

1.Ajeema Bi Ammal 2.Syed Moosa 3.S.K.Syed Sahib 4.Fiksanisa 5.Bathrunisa 6.Rowthunissa 7.Saravathunnissa ... Respondents/LRs of the 1st Plaintiff Prayer:- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam in A.S.No.35 of 1986 dated 06.08.1998 confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.462 of 1983, on the file of the learned District Munsiff, Gingee, dated 28.03.1985.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : R1 to 4 and 7 Dismissed dated 07.12.2009 R5 & 6 - No appearance

JUDGMENT

When the second appeal came up for hearing on 10.02.2017, none appeared on either sides. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter to be posted today, under the caption "For dismissal".

2. Even today, though the matter is listed under the caption "For dismissal", when the matter was called, no one has represented the appellant.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rts To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam.

2. The District Munsif, Gingee.

3. The Section Officer V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.1312 of 1999 NM(CO) CA(01/03/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/